Damn You Nielsen!
April 17, 2025
For as long as any of us have been involved with radio there is one constant complaint that is heard at every level – it’s all Nielsen’s fault. (It was Arbitron’s fault, too, but Nielsen bought that intellectual property).
Of course, radio people generally gripe about Nielsen when they have a bad book or run of books. The diaries or the meters were in the wrong places or hands. The sample isn’t large enough. Either way, the problem is not with our stations.
I admit, in my days as a Program Director I often fell into that trap. As I have spent more time analyzing Nielsen data and working with clients, I have come to a few realizations.
Being a compelling and entertaining on-air radio personality is one of the most difficult jobs in the entertainment industry. Those individuals not only need to shine “in the moment” multiple times an hour/shift, but they also have more content responsibilities than ever before. Their lives extend beyond the break into social channels, videos, podcasts and, all too often, voice tracking several other stations. They are self-contained content machines.
To convince advertisers to pay more for radio campaigns, stations need to demonstrate higher value, better targeting, and stronger ROI. Here’s how:
Since today is baseball’s opening day, it is appropriate to say we are rounding third and headed for home as we wrap up the FEBRUARY survey. Another set of data points are on deck as we examine how this whole three-minute rule – NIELSEN’s version of the pitch clock – has affected radio listening. The Ratings Experts from RESEARCH DIRECTOR, INC. – along with our double play partners from XTRENDS – will focus on share rank, as usual. However, we will also continue to look at how PUMM has been affected on a book-to-book and year-to-year basis. This is our version of inside baseball.